Thursday, September 4, 2025

Introduction To This Blog System

                                                                                                                                                              

Image used by permission

Postings may be later combined into a compound posting on this blog. Many of the postings concern my observations in various branches of science, but there are also many on technology, religion, economics and, general world issues.

I would really like to thank everyone who reads any of these blogs for your interest.
 
SCIENCE WRITING
 
Most of the postings on this blog are visits to various places around the world, and articles about such topics as history and religion. But much of the writing is about science. I do not write about what is already known but only if I can write something new, or at least a new way of looking at things.
 
If you would like a quick background in the science and mathematics that everyone should really know in the 21st Century, the posting "Scientific Literacy" provides this in about a hundred paragraphs. Similarly, "The Way Things Work" provides a quick background in everyday technology.
 
I am a Christian and I want to show that belief in God is not unscientific at all. I was interested in science long before I was interested in religion, and have never had any trouble believing that God created everything.
 
There are five major scientific theories, each arranged in the form of a textbook. The first four of the following five are on this blog.
 
"The Theory Of Stationary Space" is my cosmological theory of how so much revolves around time being explained by us being in four-dimensional space, with the dimension that we cannot access being perceived as time. This is my version of string theory, with matter actually being strings in four dimensions rather than particles in three dimensions. Everything is ultimately based on negative and positive electric charges, with energy being able to overcome the laws of attraction and repulsion of electric charges. No one has ever explained exactly what time is, and a myriad of explanations of other things fall right into place around it.
 
"The Flow Of Information Through The Universe" is about how so much can be explained by seeing how there is a limited amount of information, and it must be the same information that constructs the highest levels as the lowest levels. A ready example is how the orbits of planets around the sun is based on the orbitals of electrons around the nucleus, in the atoms of which the sun and planets are composed. This concept is extremely useful because, understanding this, we can study things that we cannot directly see by analyzing things that we can see because all must be built on the same information.
 
"The Theory Of Complexity" is about what information actually is, how energy and information is really the same thing, and how we see the universe as we do because of our perspective of being at a higher level of information than our inanimate surroundings.
 
"The Lowest Information Point" is about how, since information and energy is really the same thing and the universe always seeks the lowest energy state, it also always seeks the "Lowest Information Point". So much is explained by how the universe prefers equalities to inequalities and related ratios where the numerator of one ratio is also the denominator of the other. This explains so much from why dust particles are as big as they to why the planets and stars are the scale that they are.
 
"The Story Of Planet Earth", on the geology blog, is about how virtually every major feature of the earth's surface, both on land and seafloor, can be explained by lines of magma emergence from below that were affected by the landing of three Continental Asteroids. Many people believe that land originated from a past "super-continent", but there is no explanation of where it came from.
 
There are a few of what we could call "minor" theories, where there is not as much written as with the major theories. On this blog, there is "How Biology And Human Life Fits Into Cosmology". On the meteorology and biology blog, there is my theory of the nature of water, "Water Made Really Simple".
 
There are compound postings about science which are groupings of writing about a certain topic.
 
Scientific compound postings include, "Computer Science", "Atomic Science", "Measurement", "A Celebration Of The Inverse Square Law", "Our Solar System", "Mind-Bending Cosmology", "The Configuration Of The Solar System Made Really Simple", "In Appreciation Of Electrons", "The Science Of Human Society " and "Orbital And Escape Velocities And Impacts from Space".
 
Compound postings about history and the world include "The House Of Holy Wisdom, Where The Modern World Began", "Niagara Stories", "Economics", "How History Repeats Itself", "The Meaning Of Freedom", "The Western Hemisphere", "Our Language" and, "America And The Modern World Explained By Way Of Paris".
 
There are two compound postings about prophecies and the Bible. There is "The Aztec Prophecy" than, for prophecies that are directly made in the Bible there is "New Insight Into Bible Prophecy".
 
"Investigations" is the compound posting that is a collection of any posting about an investigation.
 
The rest of the postings are individual postings. For more detailed information about this blog, see the posting "Thanks To Readers". For general topics of conversation, see "Thoughts And Observations", on the world and economics blog.  

Other Blogs And Books

                                                                                                         

Lights at night 

Here is a quick look at my other blogs before you start this one.

On this blog, you can see a list of all postings by clicking on the year or month to the right. But on the topical blogs, that is not the case. If you click on a year or month on those blogs, it will display the postings themselves, but the list on the right will still only show those postings that were added most recently.

To access a list of all postings on those blogs, it is necessary to click on the arrow in front of the year or month in question.

http://www.markmeekeconomics.blogspot.com/ is about economics, history and, general human issues.

http://www.markmeekprogress.blogspot.com/ concerns progress in technology and ideas.

http://www.markmeekearth.blogspot.com/ is my geology and global natural history blog for topics other than glaciers. My natural history blogs concerning the impact of glaciers is http://www.markmeekworld.blogspot.com/ .

http://www.markmeekniagara.blogspot.com/ is about new discoveries concerning natural history in the general area of Niagara Falls.

http://www.markmeeklife.blogspot.com/ is my observations concerning meteorology and biology.

http://www.markmeekphysics.blogspot.com/ is my blog about physics and astronomy.

http://www.markmeekcosmology.blogspot.com/ is my version of string theory that solves many unsolved mysteries about the underlying structure and beginning of the universe.

http://www.markmeekpatterns.blogspot.com/ details my work with the fundamental patterns and complexity that underlies everything in existence.

 http://www.markmeekreligion.blogspot.com/ is my religion blog.

 http://www.markmeekcreation.blogspot.com/ is proof that there must be a god.

http://www.markmeekphotos.blogspot.com/ is my travel photos of Europe.

On my photo blogs, Blogspot will not hold all of the photos in each blog in a straight line. To see all of the photos, you must click on the bottom posting listed on the right at the top of the blog after seeing all that there are in the initial showing. The last posting in the North America blog should be "Tijuana, Mexico" and the last posting in the Europe blog should be "Notre Dame Cathedral Door And Arc De Triomphe, Paris". Each photo in the photo blogs can be clicked on to enlarge it to full screen.

My autobiography is http://www.mark-meek.blogspot.com/

My books can be seen at http://www.bn.com/ http://www.amazon.com/ or, http://www.iuniverse.com/ just do an author search for "Mark Meek".   

Beirut

So many of the cities in the Mediterranean began as settlements of the Phoenicians. It is more likely that the Phoenicians were independent coastal city-states that cooperated, rather than a unified kingdom.

Beirut, the capital and largest city of Lebanon, is a very ancient city. I see it as replacing Tyre, which was destroyed by the forces of Alexander, as the primary Mediterranean port in the area. Beirut used to be called "The Paris of the Middle East".

Beirut originated as a city with the Phoenicians, but have been through the usual parade of conquerors over the centuries, the Persians, Greeks, Romans, Islamic caliphates, Ottomans, French and, finally, independence. The Phoenician port can still be seen in Beirut.

The Phoenicians lived from trading by way of the sea. They may have been the greatest seafaring nation that there ever was. The Phoenicians began many colonies in the Mediterranean area. Carthage, which would become a great rival of Rome and is now the city of Tunis that we visited last week, began as a Phoenician colony. 

Generally, the Phoenicians colonized the south coast of the Mediterranean and the Greeks the north coast. But Palermo, in Sicily, began as a Phoenician colony. We saw in the posting on this blog, "Malta Compared With Jerusalem", that Mdina began as a Phoenician colony.

The Phoenicians reached Lisbon. Some believe that they circumnavigated Africa by ship, others believe that they may have reached Britain.

That Phoenician tradition of journeying far away and doing business can still be seen today in the Lebanese acumen for business. As one example Mexico's Carlos Slim, who became the richest man in the world, was of Lebanese extraction. There are Lebanese people in business in many places in the world, South America and west Africa in particular.

There are Phoenicians in the Bible. Hiram, of Tyre, helped to build Solomon's Temple. (Freemasons believe that Solomon's Temple was designed by one Hiram Abiff, who was killed for refusing to divulge Masonic secrets). Jezebel, the wicked wife of King Ahab, was Phoenician.

But one of the finest examples of faith was by the Phoenician woman who met Jesus. Her daughter needed to be healed but Jesus was ministering only to his own people at that point, and told her so. But the woman persisted, answering Jesus' parable of dogs eating crumbs that fall from the table. Jesus was so impressed by her faith that he granted her request and healed her daughter. That is how God works, he is impressed by the faith in Him that we show, and may then grant things that he otherwise wouldn't have.

But what the Phoenicians are best remembered for is not their seafaring. They are the ones who developed the world's first alphabet. There are three basic original ways of writing, hieroglyphics, cunieform and, the alphabet. An alphabet is made up of letters that correspond to the verbal sounds that humans can make. The term "phoenetically" means "the way something sounds". Phoenetically, as a word, comes from "Phoenician".

When you use your phone, remember that the word "phone" also comes from "Phoenician".

The Hebrew and Aramaic alphabets developed from the Phoenician idea. The Greeks developed the alphabet that is the forerunner of ours, the Latin alphabet. The word "alphabet" comes the first two Greek letters, alpha and beta.

Hieroglyphics and cunieform, the other two ways of writing other than by an alphabet, have never completely gone away. Hieroglyphic symbols are used as an international language, such as the symbols for male and female washrooms. On the highway, the symbol of a plate with a knife on one side and a fork on the other side is a hieroglyphic symbol for a restaurant. The symbol of a person in bed is the symbol for hotel and a of gas pump for fuel.

Cunieform means writing with a sharp stylus on clay and I see mathematical symbols, +, -, =, etc. as the modern form of cunieform.

But most languages today, Oriental languages like Chinese and Japanese being the exception, use alphabets, and the idea of an alphabet originated with the Phoenicians who lived in what is now Lebanon.

Nejmeh Square is the focal point of Beirut, and the following scenes begin there. The Grand Serail, which is nearby, is an Ottoman-era structure that is known as the Government Palace of Lebanon. There is also a prominent Ottoman-era mosque. We know by now, in our visits, that when you see a domed mosque built in the form of the Hagia Sophia, it is saying "The Ottomans were here". The first two of the following images, from Google Street View, are of the clock tower in the square. The last four are of the mosque. 







There are multiple scenes following. To see the scenes, after the first one, you must first click the up arrow, ^, before you can move on to the next scene by clicking the right or forward arrow, >. After clicking the up arrow, you can then hide the previews of successive scenes, if you wish.

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8966948,35.504761,3a,75y,335.58h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipM1XLO1xDRgtNbFvMUyzWSjSZGOlEeTBFLHtBTU!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipM1XLO1xDRgtNbFvMUyzWSjSZGOlEeTBFLHtBTU%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya240.35135-ro-0-fo100!7i2508!8i1254

You can see the influence that Paris has had. Notice how the streets come together at Nejmeh Square, with the clock tower in the central traffic circle, in the same way as around the Arc de Triomphe. Image from the Wikipedia article "Arc de Triomphe".


These views of Beirut, close to the sea, begin in the American University of Beirut, which has been there for over a century. The university may be abbreviated as AUB. The Corniche is the seaside promenade. The first three views, from Google Street View, are along the Corniche.








https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8883701,35.5166334,3a,75y,171.16h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipNqoZAkljb5bBdfgnevnKz9sLuc9e-_GFNHWUf3!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipNqoZAkljb5bBdfgnevnKz9sLuc9e-_GFNHWUf3%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi3.0991077-ya147.03242-ro3.1993787-fo100!7i5120!8i2560

Badaro is the name of this part of Beirut.

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.8741988,35.5162829,3a,75y,106.93h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipNAVbr-n8FpfeE5abTbJrfBQsPtkTcMR4ctxRuU!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipNAVbr-n8FpfeE5abTbJrfBQsPtkTcMR4ctxRuU%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-1.1281601-ya270.60013-ro-2.1207092-fo100!7i5120!8i2560

To the south in Beirut is the area of Hazmiyeh.

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.856976,35.533976,3a,75y,113.51h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipNHzsfXfgyA3L4aMF0JDDEuiPWhaoUjbbtYKRVD!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipNHzsfXfgyA3L4aMF0JDDEuiPWhaoUjbbtYKRVD%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-3.9562054-ya117.71044-ro0.4041648-fo100!7i7200!8i3600

Communism In Perspective

This week was Labor Day in the U.S.

Have you ever stopped to think about how the economy is working against you? Progress is usually defined as being able to accomplish the same work with a fewer number of workers. This means that it would be considered as making progress if your job could be eliminated.

The trouble with eliminating jobs is that the economy is not "linear", it operates like a circuit. A company is linear in that it would certainly be making progress if the same task could be accomplished with fewer workers. But companies, which produce products and services, are dependent upon consumer spending. If many companies could do with fewer workers then that would mean higher unemployment and less consumer spending, which would mean less demand for the products and services being produced by those companies.

The major threat to jobs now is the emergence of AI. It can do the work of thousands of knowledge workers, such as programmers. The theory of capitalism is that workers who are displaced in such a way will find something else to do, and that workers should be continuously upgrading their skills and education, and looking for opportunities. But is it fair to workers to have change coming so fast? Not so long ago, a computer science degree was considered as the ticket to success. Now AI has put that in doubt.

Donald Trump is firing thousands of U.S. Government workers, to cut the size and cost of the government. It is also possible that AI is making their jobs unnecessary. But I see what else the reason is. Those former workers will hopefully start businesses, which will boost the economy. The hoped-for boom might become known as the "Trump Spring".

I have never thought that recessions are an entirely bad thing. Recessions eliminate jobs which don't return. But the lost jobs are jobs that are not really needed anyway. Does anyone remember when there was always someone to pump your gas and bag your groceries? It seemed like they went away during a recession and never came back.

So many lines of work have gone away during my lifetime. If you once picked up a landline phone and dialed "0", an operator would answer as "operator". Most newspaper ads were drawn in pencil and being good at drawing was a very marketable skill. Printing was done with type that had to be manually set. There were always ads for correspondence courses in electronics. Now, electronics is more important than ever but has been so miniaturized as to be disposable and repairing electronic devices is no longer a skill that is in high demand. Buildings with elevators used to have elevator operators. Suddenly they went away and people had to figure out how to press the buttons themselves.

But there is another side to it. Is it entirely fair to workers, in what is supposed to be a meritocracy, that the economy is actually trying to put them out of work and they have to be continuously worried about falling behind? What about the philosophy of the Industrial Revolution? The ideal was to let machines do the work. Of course there should be continuous innovation but shouldn't we be able to relax a little bit and "let the machines do the work" instead of worrying about AI putting us out of work?

What this means is a system of guaranteed income and benefits. Some would deride this as "Communism", but the truth is that communism is still all around us.

I have a food product over here with a label that the company is "100% employee owned", as if that is a good thing. But that is exactly what the philosophy of communism is about, the workers owning the means of production.

Government involvement in the economy is what Communism is about. Only in "pure" Communism did the government completely control the economy, with no private enterprise. Donald Trump is a Republican, which we would expect to be about as far away from Communism as we could get, but the Trump Administration holds a share in Intel, which is a private company chip maker.

Why do you suppose that Communist China has so much control over the global supply of rare earth elements? These elements that are vital for modern chips are actually not rare but are difficult to mine because they are not usually very concentrated, unlike the ores of other metals. So a company that mines and processes these elements cannot expect much of an immediate profit. This naturally deters companies and creates a possible shortage.

But a Communist government can think long-term and isn't bound by the need to soon make a profit in order to stay in business. That is why China controls the rare earth market.

What about the development of the Internet? It was a vast and expensive project, originally intended as a communications web that could survive a nuclear attack. A communication would be sliced into packets and sent to the destination. If they couldn't get through by one route, then they would take another route. The packets would be reassembled at the destination.

Private companies would never have undertaken such a vast project by themselves. Even if they did, the internet would have been handicapped by all of the companies having different standards. The reason that you are reading this on the internet is that the government, which means socialism or communism, got the project going and then later turned it over to private companies.

The same goes for the space program. Private companies would have never undertaken anything like this, especially since the economic gain was not in the program itself but in the technological spin-offs. The U.S. Government undertook the program by contracting with private companies.

Passenger aircraft are not entirely the development of free enterprise. The governments commisioned the development of military aircraft, during the Second World War, and passenger aircraft were mostly based on modifications of those after the war. The two best-known U.S. aircraft from this time are the B-17 and the B-29. Later would come the B-52. The aircraft were commisioned by the government but the "B" stands for Boeing.

The automotive movement today is toward electric cars. But progress is slow for a number of reasons. The cars are expensive, difficult to charge, and expensive to fix. Maybe it's because the governments are leaving the development up to private companies. We should remember that this is a project on the order of the internet and the space program. To really get electric cars going, it may be necessary to put the profit motive aside, and get the government involved.

I am the first to agree that private companies are usually more efficient than the government. But the government is free from the need to earn a profit in a way that private companies aren't. A vast project without the prospect of immediate profit is beyond the scope of private companies. Notice that I am certainly not advocating "pure" Communism, where the government runs everything, but the government taking on great projects that are beyond the scope of private companies, and then contracting with those companies.

Another issue is national security and sovereignty. In a purely free market system there is a risk of industries that are essential to national security, such as the production of steel and microchips, leaving the country. Shouldn't the government hold onto such essential industries, regardless of whether they are making a profit?

As an example of national sovereignty, consider state airlines. It is true that private companies have a better reputation for efficiency. But complete reliance on the free market brings the possibility that citizens of a country might become dependent on foreign carriers to fly them between their own cities. Maintaining a state airline is a guarantor of national sovereignty.

Aside from essentials like steel and microchips, another example is the auto industry. In the event of a major war, the auto manufacturing sector can readily be converted to making military vehicles and equipment, and planes. It should certainly be governed overall by the free market but it would ensure national security for the government to hold a stake in it.

I have always thought that Karl Marx, whose writings were the basis of Communism, deserves some credit. He wasn't totally right, but yet he certainly wasn't totally wrong. 

THE MARX CLOUD

I have a new way of looking at the theories of Karl Marx. I conclude that the fulfillment of Marxist theory can be seen in, of all things, computer technology. Since the end of the Cold War, Marx has been viewed as one of the great losers of history. He was nowhere near completely right in his predictions, yet was on to something and cannot be ignored. When I was in London, I thought of visiting his grave in Highgate Cemetery but never got around to it.

The workers of the world did not unite and take over the means of production, as Marx had envisioned. But he was somewhat vindicated by the crash of Capitalism in 1929, as well as the somewhat lesser crashes of 1987 and 2008. He might have been pleased with the implementation of minimum wage and workplace safety laws, labor unions, unemployment benefits and social security, and especially mandatory public education. All of which, with the exception of labor unions, was virtually unheard of in the Nineteenth Century when Marx wrote his theories. 

Samuel Gompers could be seen as America's reflection of Marx. Religion, the "opiate of the masses" certainly has not faded away as expected by Marx. But it is true that the western countries, at least, are more secular than they were in the days of Marx.

We look at the theories of Marx in socio-economic terms. But what if there was another side to the theory, that of technology, even if Marx himself did not see this? Some of the fulfillment of Marxist theory certainly was in the socio-economic sphere, as the above mentioned reforms. But the other side, the technical side and it's global social effects, had to wait for the advent of computers and the internet.

Computer and phone technology has empowered the masses like nothing else, even though it is produced by companies owned by wealthy capitalists. Wikipedia, for one, seems to be straight from the pages of Marxist theory. It is the collective encyclopedia of the masses, operated by donations and open to anyone who wishes to contribute. All free apps on the internet, open to all and not entirely driven by profit motive, although there may be advertising, also fall into this category.

The nation-state has not faded away, at least not in the way that Marx supposedly envisioned. In the more than century and a half since the days of Marx, nationalism has been stronger than ever before. My theory is that people are designed to believe in something and if they drift away from religion, substitutes like nationalism will take it's place.

But yet national borders also mean less today than ever before. Trade and travel goes around the world. It is possible to wake up in any country one morning, and go to bed in any other country that night. You can log onto a web site, or make a call, or send an email virtually anywhere on earth, with the national borders in between being absolutely meaningless.

But the latest manifestation of Marxist theory is this phenomenon of collective global internet, known as "the cloud". The basic meaning of the cloud is that the data that you store, and increasingly the applications that you use, are not stored on your phone or computer but are "out there somewhere" in the cloud. This blog is an ideal example of the cloud. It is not stored on my phone. I presume that the content of this blog is kept at Google's HQ in Mountain View, California, but could be on any server farm anywhere.

Marx sensed what would come. The Nineteenth Century in Europe was a time of revolution, and he presumed that the inevitable changes that he saw would be brought about in the same way. We could say that half of the fulfillment of his theory was by way of the social reforms listed above. But the communication technology of the time was limited to telegraphs relaying Morse Code. Marx could not possibly have imagined the computer revolution which would one day manifest the other half of this fulfillment.

He also did not see that while the technical side of his theory would be fulfilled, and it would greatly empower the masses that Marx saw as exploited and ill-treated, it would be brought about by very wealthy capitalists. The difference, with which Marx would be at least partially pleased, is these capitalists would not be from an entrenched upper class, but would be college kids who got an idea, quit school to work on it, and found themselves as the billionaires which would, ironically, bring about the remaining fulfillment of Marxist theory.

This shows what Karl Marx actually envisioned. He was right but he only saw half of the picture and it would require advancement in technology, which would take time, to bring his half of the picture about.

My observation is that the best economic model is not one that is right or left, but the one which best weaves right and left together. Our economy is as complex as we are and that makes it difficult for any of us to see the entire picture. It is much easier to see either the left or the right. Both are half of the big picture.

For more about Communism see the compound posting "Investigations", December 2018, section 58) INNOCULATION AGAINST COMMUNISM.

The "Make-Work" Concept In Economics

This was previously posted as "The Make-Work Eras", and more has been added to it.

There was a vast amount of industrial production to supply America's war effort during the First World War. After the war the productive capacity was turned toward consumer goods. Industry turned out a wide range of goods, from cars to radios. This brought about the memorable decade known as the "Roaring Twenties".

Companies were naturally trying to maximize profit by charging as much as possible for their products and paying their workers as little as possible. Magnificent skyscrapers were built with the wealth that was gained. The trouble was that workers were not being paid enough to be able to afford the goods that they were producing. Manufactured goods were just piling up in warehouses. Factories began cutting back on production, meaning that workers had even less money, and it spiralled into a devastating crash, in October 1929. 

The Thirties were as bad of a time as the Twenties had been good. The economic malaise is known as the Great Depression. In various countries the governments came up with "make-work" projects in an effort to get the economy rolling again. In the U.S. the Works Projects Administration was created. The efforts centered around it were collectively known as the "New Deal".

It is easy to notice that there are a lot of stone government buildings, including schools, that were built during the 1930s. I am writing this about halfway between two nearby middle or prep schools, one of which I attended, that were built at about the same time during the Thirties. These were make-work projects. Better known such projects during this era included Boulder (Hoover) Dam and the dams of the Tennessee Valley Authority. 

In Germany the construction of the Autobahn was a project along similar lines. But none of these efforts completely brought the west out of the Great Depression. A party arose in Germany with another idea. Absorb unemployment by drastically increasing the military forces and get the factories back to full production making military equipment for them. The party was the Nazis and the plan worked brilliantly. It was only the following war that completely eradicated the Great Depression.

This concluded what we could call the First Make Work Era. This make work era is recognized as part of economic history but what I would like to add is that there has also been a Second Make Work Era that is unofficial and has not been recognized. The First Make Work Era revolved around building but the Second Make Work Era revolved around technology. 

After the Second World War ended, in 1945, the west was past the economic depression, in fact the economy was booming. But there were other pending issues. There were millions of returning soldiers that would need jobs. Many returning soldiers attended college on programs such as America's G.I. Bill. 

But these college graduates had to have something to do after graduation. Another issue after the Second World War was the competition with Communism. The greatest thing that ever happened to Communism was the crash of capitalism in 1929, as described above. This is what turned Communism into a major world economic system. This competition was not just military but was also about living standards. 

What started in the 1950s was the space program. The Nazi V2 rockets can probably be considered as the first man-made objects to enter outer space. There is no exact definition of where outer space begins, since the atmosphere gradually fades out. The first man-made object in orbit was the Soviet satellite Sputnik. 

The space program was one of the main frontiers of the competition with Communism. Like nuclear power, which was being developed at the same time, the space program had both civilian as well as military applications. There were a tremendous number of technology spin-offs from the space program, from powdered orange juice to super-strong glass. The landing of astronauts on the moon, while certainly a great accomplishment, didn't teach us much about the moon that wasn't already known. It's great benefit was all of the technology spin-offs that it brought.

I am certain that part of the motivation of the space program was as a make-work program for the college graduates of the G.I. Bill. It would produce a lot of useful technologies at the same time. We have to remember that the generation that had worked on the original make-work projects during the Thirties were now the people in power. Doesn't it make sense that they would use the economic techniques that they were familiar with?

But the space program, even with it's spin-offs, was a specialized and high-end field. It wouldn't provide jobs for the many millions of returning veterans and workers in industries making things for the military, whose labor would no longer be necessary. Those millions of jobs would be provided by the drastic expansion of the automobile industry after the Second World War. 

In postwar North America having extensive front yards and back yards came into style. When homes have yards, it means that everything must be further apart. This brings us to what we could call "The Automobile Spiral". Having everything further apart means that car ownership is a practical necessity. This, in turn, means that everything must be still further apart because cars require a driveway at the home to park in, wider streets to accommodate them and, highways for through traffic to avoid local congestion.

Most of all, cars mean that there must be parking lots wherever people will be driving to. It is these parking lots that shape the forms of our cities like nothing else. Urban areas balloon with parking lot space so that cities tend to sprawl into one another, rather than having much of a sharp definition.

None of this takes place if buses, streetcars, bicycles and, walking can accomplish daily transportation. But that is only practical without yards. Levittown, New York is considered as the prototype postwar suburb and was followed by a development in Pennsylvania with the same name. Those suburbs were named after the builder, but could just as easily have been named "Yardtown".

These three images are from Google Earth. The first image is of an older neighborhood, built before many people had cars. Notice how dense are the homes at the bottom and businesses at the top.

Here is a postwar suburb. There is a lot of green yard space, making the cars that you can see in driveways more of a necessity.

The cars then require parking lots wherever people go. This furthers the automobile spiral, making cars even more necessary. The vast gray areas, in the following image, are parking lots.

The entire economy is shaped by those backyards and front yards and parking lots. The auto industry quickly became one of the most important. The oil industry grew alongside it to provide fuel for the cars that were made necessary by the distance which yards put between everything. Building and maintaining the necessary highways was yet another major industry. The Urban Renewal movement, from the 1950s to the 1970s, was the reshaping of the older sections of the city to accommodate the cars.

Actually making the cars was only the beginning of the jobs created by the new car culture. Everything from maintenance to sales and accessories to gas stations and building garages for homes provided millions of jobs. In the late Fifties the Interstate Highway System would be built for all of these cars. Doesn't it seem that the postwar development of the car culture was motivated, at least in part, as a general make-work program, not as high-end as the space program, by the people in power who remembered the programs of the Thirties? 

The millions of returning soldiers after the end of the Second World War started families, and this brought about another postwar issue. Their children would be known as the Baby Boomers. The first of the Baby Boomers would graduate from high school in 1964. That would mean a steady flow of millions of people who needed jobs. The people in power must have dreaded nothing more than the millions of people without jobs that they remembered from the Thirties.

Could it be just a coincidence that America's large-scale involvement in the Vietnam War began just as the first Baby Boomers were graduating from high school and would need jobs, in 1964?

The confrontation with Communism was still going on at this time, but the primary purpose of the Vietnam War was not the confrontation on the military side. It would be all of the production that the war would bring and all the jobs that it would provide, and the economic prosperity that it would produce. Remembering that it was the Second World War that finally brought the west out of the Great Depression. We have seen this in more detail in the section 17) AMERICA'S WAR IN VIETNAM, in the compound posting "Investigations" December 2018.

I define the postwar "Second Make-Work Era" as being unofficial and unannounced, unlike the first one, and revolving around technology rather than building. It was also more diverse than the first one in that it had the space program at the high end and the auto industry at the low end.

Ronald Reagan's "Strategic Defense Initiative", of the 1980s, was planned to be a vast high-technology system of defense against nuclear attack. It was so high-tech that it was nicknamed "Star Wars", after the movie. Since Reagan was a former actor, it might have been inspired by the movie. 

This system, which was eventually cancelled, would have required years of research and development. It would have been like the space program in that it, and spin-off developments, would have provided a lot of technical jobs. I am sure that this was an important part of the plan, possibly the most important part, and I consider the Strategic Defense Initiative as the "Third Make-Work Era", although it was ultimately cancelled.

Now we might be coming to the Fourth Make-Work Era. Since Make-Work Eras have worked before, at improving living standards and preventing catastrophic unemployment, why shouldn't there be a fourth one?

Technology has now advanced to the point where it threatens to put entire industries out of work. AI is changing the whole economy. Just as machines could do the work of many manual laborers, and put them out of work, so AI can do the work of vast numbers of knowledge workers.

Search engines used to direct queries to web sites. But now AI is changing that and an AI bot is answering questions, making it unnecessary to visit a web site. This threatens much of the web-based economy.

Not long ago, a computer science degree was considered as the ticket to success. Now that is in doubt as AI can do the work of thousands of programmers.

When was the last time you called customer service and talked to a real person? Now we don't need real people anymore, AI has made them obsolete.

These companies are marketing goods and services and if millions of people are made redundant then they won't have much money to spend on these goods and services. Making a company more efficient, by accomplishing the same amount of work with fewer workers, sounds like a positive development. But if many companies are doing the same thing, it reduces the consumer spending upon which all the companies are dependent.

The Donald Trump Administration has released many people who had been working for the U.S. Government. I didn't see it announced but it could well be because AI has made their jobs unnecessary.

At the same time as all of this employment loss, because of AI, many countries are announcing major increases in armaments production, and some announcing increases in the military forces. The Ukraine War is continually advancing the use of drones and AI in warfare. Donald Trump's "Golden Dome" is similar in concept to the 1980s Strategic Defense Initiative.

Doesn't it appear that this increase in armaments production and research, just as AI might be putting millions of people out of work, is actually the beginning of the Fourth Make-Work Era?

Donald Trump And BRICS

I won't repost it but we saw how the tariff policies of Donald Trump could be a great boost for BRICS. This is the diverse organization of nations that is looking to counter the economic dominance of the West. This week saw the meeting of the SCO, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, in China. This is a kind of parallel organization to BRICS, having many of the same member nations. My impression is that the SCO is more about the military while BRICS is more about economics. Donald Trump's tariffs are the best thing that ever happened to both organizations.

Here is a link to the posting.

www.markmeeksideas.blogspot.com/2025/04/donald-trump-and-brics.html?m=0

Apocalyptic Developments

This is in regard to the scenario in the posting "The End Of The World As We Know It" and the parallel posting "Inducing The Apocalypse", both June 2025.

The world took a step toward the one-world system that we know will be influenced by the Antichrist. The SCO, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, met in Tianjin. The tariffs of Donald Trump have driven the leaders of China, Russia and, India close together. The nations that are members of this organization now comprise over 40% of the world's population. But we know that the Antichrist's one-world system won't last and will fragment into the apocalyptic series of wars. Vladimir Putin spoke of the "new system" that was emerging.

The Book of Revelation states that, in the Last Days of the world, people will have a "mark" on their right hand or forehead. St. John was an ancient man that was given a vision of the distant future but had not the slightest idea of modern technology, so he described it as best he could. I have long been sure that the "mark", that is required to buy or sell, is actually phones and debit or credit cards. There are also headset phones, to talk while driving, and I presumed that this is what the forehead meant. But facial recognition technology has made great strides recently, and is in the news all the time. This includes iris scans and this is likely what the forehead prophecy means.

In Praise Of Lasers

The military parade in China this week brought attention to lasers as defensive weapons but I think this would also be the best route to nuclear fusion.

Light actually exerts force. The force is electrical in nature, since light is electromagnetic and negatively charged electrons are the outermost part of atoms. But electromagnetic waves take the form of a sine wave and the waves are out-of-step, meaning that their peaks and troughs strike the object at different times, as well as being of all different wavelengths. The result is that the force is dissipated.

The principle of a laser is to generate light of one fixed wavelength and aligned so that the waves are all in step with each other. When this is done the beam will exert force and will not spread with distance, as light usually does.

THE REACTOR MENTALITY 

A much-awaited development is power from nuclear fusion. Fission, meaning to split atoms, has long been a source of power but no one has yet made fusion, meaning to fuse atoms together, into a practical source of power. 

If only fusion could be made to work, it holds tremendous promise. Fission only works with the very expensive and rare 235 isotope of uranium or the man-made plutonium. Fusion can work with any atoms, lighter atoms are easier to fuse together. Unlike fission, fusion produces no radioactive wastes. Fusion would produce far more energy per mass than fission.

It's certainly not that fusion can't be done. The sun and stars actually operate by fusion. A star is born when enough matter comes together for it's mutual gravity to overcome the electron repulsion between atoms and fuse lighter atoms into heavier ones. The new heavier atom contains less internal energy than the lighter atoms that were fused together to form it. The excess energy is released as radiation and that is why stars shine. The sun is now in the process of fusing four hydrogen atoms into one helium atom. 

Fission, the splitting of atoms that we use now, is actually a secondary nuclear process. All stars operate by fusion and, as time goes by, successively heavier elements are fused together. This releases more energy per time and upsets the star's equilibrium between the inward force of gravity and the outer force of the energy that is released. The sun will eventually swell into a "red giant", but the largest stars will explode from the center in a supernova. A tremendous amount of energy is released by the supernova and this fuses atoms together into heavier atoms that wouldn't ordinarily exist, as the ordinary fusion process only goes as far as iron. 

That is why iron and lighter elements are exponentially more common than heavier elements. This is where the uranium comes from that we use for fission. The energy we obtain is energy that originated in the supernova of the large star that preceded the sun. Some of these heavier elements are less-than-stable and gradually emit particles or radiation to reach a more stable state. These emissions are known as radioactivity.

The trouble with making fusion into a practical energy source is actually the tremendous amount of energy that it releases. This energy fuses more atoms, which releases more energy, so that the process is self-sustaining. But since it is energetic enough to fuse atoms together, that means no material made of atoms can contain the process. The only way to contain it is by a magnetic field, but this is very challenging and requires completely new technology. 

There is another way to fuse atoms together, and that is by lasers. I think that we would be better off taking this route to fusion power. It will be wonderful if the magnetic field containment is ever perfected and made practical. But who knows how long that is going to take? In the meantime we can proceed along the laser route.

I think we have the mentality of what a fusion reactor should be, that it should be along the lines of the existing fission reactors. But how about some thinking outside the box? What about an ordinary car engine? The same concept could apply to a fusion reactor. Energy is released in a chamber as lasers, mounted in the walls, fuse atoms together. Some of the energy is rerouted to power the lasers, and the rest is useful energy. This is in the same way that energy released by combustion is rerouted to drive the pistons.

LASER DEFENSE 

The wars that are underway are both proving grounds for ballistic missiles and drones. These missiles and drones will be everywhere. There are defensive missiles that can shoot them down. The trouble is that the defensive missiles tend to cost a lot more than the missiles and drones that they shoot down. A drone might cost a thousand dollars while the missile that shoots it down costs a million dollars.

Research into laser defense is already underway and that is definitely the best way to be secure from missiles and drones.

Thursday, August 28, 2025

Tunis

The Phoenicians, based in what is now Lebanon, were great sailors in ancient times. They founded settlements around the Mediterranean, some of which grew into the cities of today. One of those settlements, on the African side of the Mediterranean, was called Carthage.

Carthage grew into a great and influential city that later became a major opponent of the Romans. It fought three separate wars with Rome, with much of the combat taking place in Italy. The wars were called the Punic Wars. Rome finally got the upper hand and destroyed Carthage. Later it was rebuilt as a Roman city.

I once wasn't sure whether to believe the story of Hannibal attacking Rome with elephants across the Alps, but I suppose it is true.

The following images are of the ruins of Carthage. The first image, from Google Earth, shows Phoenicia as a red dot and Carthage as a yellow dot. The next two images are from Google Street View.



There are multiple scenes following. To see the scenes, after the first one, you must first click the up arrow, ^, before you can move on to the next scene by clicking the right or forward arrow, >. After clicking the up arrow you can then hide the previews of successive scenes, if you wish. 

Carthage, now known as Tunis, has been an important city since it was founded, and today gets a lot of visitors. The following scenes are of the medina of Tunis, the old part of the city. Tunis was an important city of medieval Islam. The first four images, of the streets and markets of the medina, are from Google Street View.




https://www.google.com/maps/@36.7979183,10.1726181,3a,75y,152.44h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sJFwbG7vli0gah-fEUT_16A!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0%26panoid%3DJFwbG7vli0gah-fEUT_16A%26yaw%3D152.43642903764615!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTIxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D 

Here is some more of the older part of Tunis.

The Zaytuna Mosque also had a great university. The first two images of the Mosque are from Google Street View.


Here is some scenes beginning at the university, which is near the mosque.

Downtown Tunis runs along Avenue Habib Bourguiba, named for the first president of modern Tunisia. The country was a colony of France and you can see the French influence. But this street is as attractive as the Champs-Elysees. The first four images are from Google Street View.




 https://www.google.com/maps/@36.7996142,10.1799937,3a,75y,160.15h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sIPM5p9_zLyEF9n-dh038pQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0%26panoid%3DIPM5p9_zLyEF9n-dh038pQ%26yaw%3D160.1476228119409!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTIxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D 

This is an area near downtown Tunis.

Tunis has a monument just like the one in Algiers, but not as high. The first image is from Google Street View. 


This is the monument, at Kasbah Square.

The following scenes begin at the Clock Tower.

These are the modern buildings of Tunis. The first four images are from Google Street View.




The following scenes begin along Avenue Mohamed V. This is a main business street of Tunis and was named for the former king of Morocco.


This is a neighborhood of Tunis away from the city center.

The important thing that has happened in Tunisia in recent years is that the Arab Spring began there, in 2009. This was a general spirit of uprising against the governments of Arab countries. The Arab Spring had a far-reaching effect that hasn't finished playing out yet, as the Syrian Civil War was part of it. There was resulting changes of government in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria and, Yemen. One of the most visible manifestations of the Arab Spring was the overthrow, capture and, killing of Moammar Gaddafi, in neighboring Libya.

That is the city of Tunis. The following seven images, from Google Street View, are further south in Tunisia. There are a lot of places that look like the American west.