Today's visit may not be an exact definition of the area comprising America's Midwest. But then, it doesn't seem to have an exact definition.
Thursday, July 27, 2023
America's Midwest
U.S. Ethnic Distribution
With our visit to America's Midwest today let's have a look at it's ethnic distribution.
While working at jobs taking calls from across the U.S., the name and address of the caller would appear on my computer screen. As many thousands of calls were taken, certain definite patterns in the ethnic distribution of the country, going by the names, became apparent.
ARRANGEMENT OF IMMIGRANT GROUPSI realized how the major European ethnic groups in the U.S. had arranged themselves in much the same way as their homelands were in Europe. The Italian-American heartland is the northeastern U.S. On a map, this part of the country forms a peninsula just as Italy does on a map of Europe. New York City, with it's considerable population of Italian descent, occupies about the same position on this "peninsula" as does Rome on a map of Italy.
As the population of Germany increased in the Nineteenth Century, space became more scarce on the Luneberg Heath, the plain across the northern part of the country. Many of those who wished to farm headed for the open spaces of the U.S. midwest. To the north of Germany is the Scandinavian countries and, just as in Europe, immigrants from those countries positioned themselves to the north of the Germans, particularly in Minnesota and the Dakotas.
In Europe, to the east of Germany lies Poland. Bringing this pattern to North America, Polish settlers positioned themselves to the east of the Germans. In fact, I noticed what we could call a "Mirror Poland" in the U.S. Warsaw, Poland's capital city, is toward the eastern part of the country. If, in America, Chicago represents the new Warsaw, cities like Cleveland and the Buffalo suburb of Cheektowaga can be considered as new versions of Polish cities to the west of Warsaw.
But in America, Chicago is to the west of the Polish community while in Poland, Warsaw is to the east, making this part of the U.S. a mirror version of Poland. However, Poland did not exist as a nation when the wave of immigrants came in the late Nineteenth Century and the last time Poland existed territorially before that Warsaw was indeed to the west of the country. I noticed a new wave of Polish immigrants to the U.S. since the end of the Iron Curtain and these are focused on New York City instead of Chicago.
In Europe, Portugal is a small country on the edge of the continent against the ocean. Fitting this arrangement pattern, Portuguese immigrants to America have chosen Rhode Island as the New Portugal and could not have picked a state that came closer to mirroring Portugal's position in Europe.
On a map, Texas resembles geographically the Indian subcontinent. This might subconsciously draw Indians to settle there and indeed Texas has about 8.7 percent of America's population but about 11 percent of it's immigrants from India.
This immigrant arrangement pattern does not include those whose homelands are not far away from America. Cubans simply cross over to Florida and Mexicans occupy what we could call the "Natural Mexico", which includes the lands of the U.S. southwest which were once a part of Mexico.
DISPERSION OF IMMIGRANT GROUPS
A number of patterns in the dispersion of immigrant groups also became apparent to me. Irish-Americans have dispersed throughout the country from their traditional heartland of Massachusetts much more than Polish and Italian immigrants have. I could detect only a faint concentration of Irish names around Boston. It is true that Irish immigrants arrived before those from Italy and Poland but I believe a major factor was that those from Ireland arrived speaking English.
It is easy to see which ethnic group was the first immigrant settlers, and the influence of the Civil War of 1861-65 also shows up. The only concentration of Anglo and Scotch names in America is in the south. In other areas they seem to be the background among which other groups settled. This is because the waves of immigrants from Europe in the late Nineteenth Century went to the north, particularly New York City, because it had won the Civil War. The Anglo and Scotch names were in America before the Civil War.
It is obvious that the heartland of African-Americans is the southern states. In the rest of the country, black people are very heavily concentrated in cities. The only place I noticed a significant number of black people in small towns was in the south, presuming that I could tell a black person by their voice. If I had never heard of the town I presumed it to be a small town. This clearly indicates that the black dispersion from the south to the rest of the country was relatively recent.
German-Americans seemed to me to be the most rural but black Americans are by far the most urban. If German-Americans can be said to have a city, it is Milwaukee or maybe Omaha. More recent immigrant groups tend to choose a hub city. The concentration of Arab names around Detroit is really striking and Fresno continues to serve as the hub for Armenians in America.
THE HUB CITIES FOR IMMIGRANTS
America's two great hubs for immigrants are, of course, New York and Los Angeles. The important factor to consider is whether the immigrant group arrived primarily by ship or by plane, thus indicating the time frame of arrival.
In the past, immigrants arrived by ship. Thus by simple geography, Europeans arrived in New York and the far fewer Asians in Los Angeles. This can easily be seen in previous immigrant patterns but now has changed completely due to airplanes. Europeans seemed to me to be as likely to land in Los Angeles as Asians were to start out in New York.
One recent immigrant group that does not seem to start out in the primary immigrant hubs as much as the other groups is those from India. The reason is obvious, there is no Indiatowns like there are Chinatowns simply because Indian immigrants tend to speak English.
America is full of both French and Spanish names. Yet, I notice no concentration of these names at all around the traditional hub cities. French names are concentrated in the northern New England states and Spanish names in the southwest, in Florida and, in New York City.
This tells me that there was little direct immigration from France to America and the ancestors of most Americans with French names were French-Canadians first. Since we know the Spanish names around New York belong mostly to Puerto Ricans, it is also clear that there was little direct immigration from Spain to the U.S. and that these immigrants came from other countries in the western hemisphere.
These patterns in immigration do not show up as well in Canada because it's population is so concentrated against the southern border instead of being spread throughout the country or in Britain because it has only been a major immigrant destination for the past fifty or sixty years and two thirds of it's immigrants are concentrated in the London area.
Thursday, July 20, 2023
Chicago
Chicago is by far the largest city of the U.S. state of Illinois. It is located on the western shore of Lake Michigan, near the southern end of the lake.
Rarely has there been a more natural location for a city. With Lake Michigan as a waterway, Chicago is the focal point of America's Midwest. Trains arrive from all directions as ships arrive on the lake, so that goods, raw materials and, livestock are manufactured or processed and then transferred from one to another. It soon grew into America's largest city, after New York, and is still the country's largest city after New York and Los Angeles.The advantages that those two cities have is their more direct ocean ports, but no other city has Chicago's central location to the agricultural heartland, combined with it's access to the Great Lakes as a waterway. There is also a canal, the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, that gave ships on the Mississippi River access to Chicago. Although that canal is now more likely to be in the news for the danger of allowing Asian Carp into the Great Lakes.
That central location was reflected in the late Twentieth Century in that Chicago's main airport, O'Hare, was for decades the busiest airport in the world. The passengers on it's flights were not all destined for Chicago but the city's location made it's airport ideal as the main hub for changing flights.
Downtown Chicago, referred to as "The Loop", is centered around the Chicago River. The construction of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal reversed the direction of the river so that it now brings water in from Lake Michigan, rather than flowing outward into the lake.
One of the symbols of the city is the famous sign on the Chicago Theater. The following scenes begin there.
There are multiple scenes following. To see the scenes, after the first one, you must first click the up arrow, ^, before you can move on to the next scene by clicking the right or forward arrow, >, After clicking the up arrow, you can then hide the previews of successive scenes, if you wish.
The Art Deco style stone building in the first of the following views is the Merchandise Mart. This was once the largest building in the world and was later owned by the Kennedy Family.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8869321,-87.6350612,3a,75y,357.51h,95.79t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1sOP6xKdNPUiIu1hScofadCA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DOP6xKdNPUiIu1hScofadCA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D130.92589%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
Chicago's version of Coney Island is Navy Pier. The black building in the skyline that is shaped like an elongated, but unfinished, Pyramid, with dual antennas on the top, is the John Hancock Building.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8922487,-87.6022357,3a,75y,270h,90t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1s9MlB-3DlHyzHTU61IUglrg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D9MlB-3DlHyzHTU61IUglrg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D186.44312%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
Just north of The Loop, along North Michigan Avenue, is the Magnificent Mile, and some more views of the tall buildings.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8953566,-87.624183,3a,75y,56.73h,90t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1stJatqjEQIe0G0FtDV_SRLw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DtJatqjEQIe0G0FtDV_SRLw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D48.605026%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
Further north from downtown is the neighborhood known as Gold Coast.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9078206,-87.6276237,3a,75y,167.19h,90t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1sIn1N8DFxWtVMLz34CZg9sw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DIn1N8DFxWtVMLz34CZg9sw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D170.39877%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
Chicago's version of Central Park is Grant Park. 1968 was a year of turmoil in the U.S. There was racial riots in the cities, violent protests against the Vietnam War and the rise of the counterculture, centered around the Hippies. The Democrat National Convention was held in Chicago.
The Democrat Party, one of America's two major political parties, was generally preferred by the counterculture and the anti-war movement. But the party was in as much turmoil as the country as a whole. President Lyndon Johnson was a Democrat, and was eligible to run for reelection in 1968, but he announced that he did not want the nomination. This opened the way for Robert ( Bobby ) Kennedy, brother of the popular president John F. Kennedy who had been assassinated, to seek the nomination. But he had also been assassinated, earlier in 1968, as had Martin Luther King, which had inflamed the racial tension.
As the Democrat National Convention was going on, to decide on a candidate for the upcoming election, there was a massive counterculture and anti-war rally in Grant Park. The Chicago Police were, to put it mildly, not gentle in dealing with the protesters. Some people claim that the rally's display of disturbing disorder was what cost the Democrats the 1968 election. Hubert Humphrey, Lyndon Johnson's vice-president, got the Democrat nomination but lost to Republican Richard Nixon on election day.
Not long after this, one of the greatest bands of the rock music era emerged. It was named for the Chicago Transit Authority, the corporation that operates Chicago's buses and trains. How often does a transit authority get a band named for it? Later, the name of the band was shortened to simply "Chicago".
A little bit earlier, there had been another prominent band that had been named for the fountain in Grant Park. It is called Buckingham Fountain, and the band was "The Buckinghams". Their peak year was 1967. The following scenes begin at Buckingham Fountain in Grant Park.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8752306,-87.6187774,3a,75y,340.19h,90t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1suBK1oTsfgAvC7SLc19e0oA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DuBK1oTsfgAvC7SLc19e0oA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D344.98535%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
Many major companies have their headquarters in Chicago. Boeing relocated there, much to the disappointment of Seattle. The first of the following views are of the "Hamburger University", where McDonald's trains it's franchisees at it's main headquarters.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8842244,-87.6540054,3a,75y,164.53h,95.19t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sZZYET0VcFKrAmN0qublOzg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DZZYET0VcFKrAmN0qublOzg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D254.15695%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192
In October of 1871, much of the city was destroyed in the Chicago Fire. The closely-packed buildings of what is now the central part of the city were made mostly of wood. The weather recently had been very dry. This was before the days when most people would have electricity. Lanterns operated on oil or kerosene. Most cooking was done with an open flame. One evening, the inevitable happened.
The legend is that a Mrs. O'Leary's cow knocked over a lantern that started the fire. But a legend is all that it is. Mrs. O'Leary has since been completely exonerated.
Artifacts from the fire are occasionally still being found. I recall reading that some digging was being done when a mysterious mass of metal was found. Closer examination revealed that it was a clump of nails that had been melted together by the heat in 1871.
Anyway, it is known where the fire started and it was decided that it would be a good location for the training academy of the Chicago Fire Dept. The first of the following scenes begin there. The stepped black building, with the dual antennas on top, is the Willis Tower, formerly the Sears Tower. Like a pyramid remaining from a once-great civilization, this serves as a reminder of what an important company Sears once was.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8690096,-87.6418002,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sYV3dVsBhQpw4aepO79u-AQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DYV3dVsBhQpw4aepO79u-AQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D86.59827%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192
The sculpture in the center of the first of the following views marks the spot, at the University of Chicago, where the first controlled nuclear reaction took place, in 1942. This first nuclear reactor was massive, and extremely crude, but it worked and demonstrated a chain reaction.
It had to be so massive because, as of yet, there was no enrichment of uranium, separating out the fissionable isotope 235 atoms, so that only one of every about 140 uranium atoms was actually fissionable. Many thousands of blocks of graphite, which is actually the "lead" in pencils, were assembled as the moderator, to slow down neutrons.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.7925296,-87.6013267,3a,75y,91.17h,95.39t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s9t64zCz4EekSS7TxXAmJUg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D9t64zCz4EekSS7TxXAmJUg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D131.63976%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192
Finally, in the northern part of the city, one of the most historic and best-known sports stadiums in America is Wrigley Field. This is the area around there.
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9482192,-87.6573772,3a,75y,90h,95.8t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1syiHgXY2fWiim05XxGiro_w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DyiHgXY2fWiim05XxGiro_w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D42.779022%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
The Concentration Of Matter In Space
This is being reposted because more has been added to it.
The distribution of matter in the universe, relative to space, is extremely sparse. A figure that is sometimes given is that, in the universe as a whole, there are about three hydrogen atoms per cubic meter of space. That is so sparse that the density of matter, relative to space in the universe as a whole, is nearly infinitesimal. It is probably not something that we could attach a meaningful number to.
With the expansion of the universe the density of matter overall is becoming even more sparse. But galaxies tend to collect in groups, we call ours the "Local Group". The groups are moving apart, but not the galaxies within a group. Although the density of matter within a galaxy is still extremely sparse, it is maybe a million times the density of the vast, empty reaches of intergalactic space. Not to mention that the interiors of atoms themselves are almost all empty space.
This theory that I have developed to explain the sparseness of matter in the universe offers another explanation of quantum physics. Even if we cannot effectively put a number on it the density of matter, relative to space, is information, and that information must have come from somewhere.
There is an interpretation of quantum physics, the "Copenhagen" Interpretation, that has a quantum system inhabiting all possible quantum states but then, when it is observed, it undergoes collapse into only one state. The observation itself is a vital part of the quantum interaction.
In the universe there were a nearly infinite number of arrangements and patterns that matter might have taken, following the Big Bang, but of all those possible patterns the matter of the universe took only one of them, the universe that we see today.
What do you notice here?
1) The density of matter in the universe, relative to space, is nearly infinitesimal.
2) The number of possible patterns and permutations that the matter in the universe might have fallen into is nearly infinite. But it fell into only one of those patterns, which is the universe that we see today.
Could there be a connection between those two things? The density of matter in the universe, relative to space, is information. This information had to come from somewhere. Where else could it have come from? Isn't this the most logical answer, that there must be room left in space for every arrangement of matter in the universe that might have been, but only one of those arrangements actually comes to be?
Let me state now that I have decided on the terminology "might have been" rather than "could have been" because "could" seems to imply that it should have been.
My theory is not that the universe we see is what happened, but the information of what didn't happen must still be out there somewhere whether in parallel universes or unrealized quantum states, but that the empty space must be maintained for the information of what might have happened but didn't happen and the matter of the universe that did happen must exist within the vastness of this empty space.
Could it be that there is a great number, we can designate it as P for "pattern" or "permutation" even if we cannot effectively determine it's value, that describes both the density of matter relative to the space of the universe, 1 / P, and the number of possible patterns or arrangements that matter in the universe could have taken, P?
Suppose that we are looking for a particular address on a street. The address that we have is information. It contains more information if there are more houses on the street that it is not.
Remember my definition of complexity. The complexity of a number, or the amount of information within it, is the value of the denominator when the number is expressed as a ratio or fraction. Thus 1/10 contains twice as much information as 1/5.
In a similar way the particular arrangement of all the matter in the universe is an address, one permutation among many. Having an address doesn't make any sense unless there are other addresses that it might have been. Empty space is all of the addresses that it might have been, but is not. Every bit of information that went into matter and it's arrangement in the universe might have been different. All the matter of the universe comprises one address, as opposed to multiple addresses, because it is all interrelated and has a common beginning.
If there is movement of matter in space, so that the pattern changes, it still doesn't change the basic possible number of patterns. The possible arrangements continue as lighter elements are fused into heavier ones by way of fusion in stars, but the value of P stays constant because the matter of the universe has a common origin in the Big Bang. Being other than constant would mean that information is either being lost or gained out of nowhere.
Most matter that we deal with consists of atoms. Sub-atomic particles tend to be electrically-charged, such as protons and electrons, and an ordinary atom has equal positive and negative charges so that it's overall charge is zero, although an atom can become an ion by losing or gaining an electron. The fact that the inside of the atom is almost all empty space would be a reflection of all that the atom might have been, given that atoms are the universal structure of matter that balances out positive and negative electric charges, but it became only one of these possibilities.
The vast majority of the inside of an atom is empty space. This is also one address among many empty addresses, and the empty space is information. The ratio of matter to space inside the atom is, again, a subset of P, because it involves only the inside of the atom.
Hydrogen atoms, of course, have the highest proportion of empty space, relative to matter. Heavier atoms were formed by fusion and so lost some of this information by radiation. But since the two electric charges in the universe are a given, some other structure where the two opposite charges balance out might have formed and the "empty addresses" within atoms are a reflection of this.
What I find interesting is that there is a particle that is overall neutral in electric charge and balances out the negative and positive charges. This particle is the neutron. But neutrons are not primary particles. They are formed by crunching an electron into a proton, known as K-capture.
Furthermore neutrons exist only within atoms, if a neutron is alone outside an atom it will break down into a proton and an electron in an average of about 15 minutes. This is because a compact neutron does not maintain all of the "empty addresses" representing the many forms that the primary zero charge structure might have taken while an atom, with all of it's internal empty space, does.
One obvious thing about matter that might have been different is the equal, but opposite electric charge on an electron and a proton. We describe this charge either as -1 for an electron or +1 for a proton. But, had the universe been different then this charge might have been different. If the charge was greater then atoms would likely have been more massive and less massive if the charge was lesser.
The density of matter, relative to space, within galactic groups could also be a subvalue of P, in a way similar to within the atom. The universe is expanding but the expansion is the vast galactic groups moving away from each other. The density within galactic groups is relatively constant, the Andromeda Galaxy in our Local Group and our galaxy are actually moving closer to each other. The subvalue means just the density of matter in the space inside our Local Group, and the number of possible patterns that matter could have taken of which only one became reality, of only our Local Group of galaxies once it formed.
There can only be such a subvalue of P in a unit of space that has become partially independent of the rest of the universe in how the matter in the unit is arranged. If we wanted to determine the subvalue for the earth, for example, we would have to go back to the star that preceded the sun which scattered it's matter across space in a supernova. Our determination would have to involve how that star formed, and what it's P subvalue was.
At any rate the density of matter in space is information, and this information must have come from somewhere. There is some number that describes the density of matter in space, which I am calling P, even if we cannot effectively determine what that number is.
It isn't information if there was no possibility of it being different. That which is comprises information but to be information it must be set against that which isn't, so that which isn't is also information, and information cannot just be lost. Information is what is set against the background of what might have been but isn't.
For something to be somewhere else in the universe it would have to have been something else. The empty addresses must be there to represent what might have been but wasn't.
The only thing that makes sense to me as being the source of the density of matter in space is the reciprocal of the total number of possible arrangements that matter could have taken, and that number I refer to as P. The one that it took is the arrangement of matter that we see in the universe today.
My cosmology theory, "The Theory Of Stationary Space", has it's own explanation for the sparseness of matter in space, that matter is one dimension, of the two dimensions of the original two-dimensional sheet that was dispersed among four dimensions of the background space. The other dimension of the sheet was released as energy, in what we perceive as the Big Bang.
But these two answers are different ways of expressing the same thing. The more dimensions of space there are, relative to the one that became matter, the more "things that might have been" there will be.
Not only is there space that must be empty because it represents the "empty addresses" of "things that might have been", there must also be a universe of patterns that go unmanifested. We have geometric forms, such as squares, cubes, circles, spheres and, triangles. But there must be many others that are not manifested because the matter of the universe never fell into those patterns.
This applies not only to geometric forms but also to the basic patterns of the universe that we saw in "The Theory Of Complexity". There could also be missing numbers that might have been manifested but we cannot imagine because they never get manifested by the matter of our universe.
I am presuming here that the one thing that might not have been different is that the universe is compromised of two electric charges, negative and positive. In my cosmology theory empty space consists of a checkerboard of alternating negative and positive changes, in multiple dimensions. These two charges are why there are two opposite directions in each dimension of space. If there were three opposite charges there would have to be three opposite directions in each dimension. This theory here is about arrangements of matter in space, rather than the space itself.
There are two basic sets of quantum theories.
There is the "collapse" scenarios, such as the Copenhagen Interpretation, where any quantum system exists in a multitude of quantum states until it "collapses" into only one state upon being observed. The observation is a vital part of the quantum interaction.
Then there is the "many worlds" scenarios. In this way of looking at quantum interactions there is no "collapse" into one quantum state but there must be unseen parallel universes so that what might have happened, but didn't happen, in this universe must happen in another universe. Basically there can't be anything that could have happened but didn't happen, because what didn't happen is information also and information cannot just be lost.
There is also an idea by the physicist Richard Feynman called the "Path Integral". What this says is that what happens is to take everything that could happen and add them all together.
But what none of this really takes account of is space, particularly the concentration of matter in space. The sparseness of matter in space is information, and information must have come from somewhere. The question is not only why the arrangement of matter in space is what it is but also why the concentration of matter in space, it's sparseness, is what it is.
What I am stating here is that the present arrangement of matter in space is one of many "addresses" that might have been but weren't, and matter is concentrated in space in such a way that the "empty addresses" of things and arrangements of things that might have been but weren't must be preserved, because they are part of the information of what is.
What I refer to as an "address" here is not a particular location but the particular arrangement of matter in the entire universe. The density of matter in space should be a vital part of quantum physics and neither of the sets of quantum theories takes this into account.
FAR OUTER MATHEMATICS
The patterns and mathematics that are not manifested by our universe but might have been manifested if the universe had been different are what I refer to as "Far Outer Mathematics". Here is an explanation of what I mean.
We use mathematics to describe the world around us. To be able to describe something using mathematics we must completely understand it. Once we do we can do all kinds of useful calculations because everything we know operates by the same mathematics.
But we do not have unlimited capacity to understand the world around us. Our minds have a certain complexity and we can only understand that which is less complex than our minds. Anything that is more complex than our minds we would not be able to understand enough to apply mathematics to it because we would have to be "smarter than ourselves", which is impossible.
Somewhere out there is a formula that describes everything that you do. You cannot access it because it deals with your mind's own complexity and this would require you to be "smarter than yourself", which is impossible. But yet this unseen formula must operate by the usual mathematics.
This is what I refer to as "outer mathematics", mathematics which must exist but which is beyond our grasp because of our own limited complexity. All of textbook mathematics is "inner mathematics", which is within our grasp.
But aside from this set of "outer mathematics" there must be a still more distant set of outer mathematics. As stated we use mathematics because it effectively describes the world around us. But what if that world, actually the entire universe, had been different?
The matter that all except particle physicists deal with is made of atoms. We could say that atoms are "exclusive" so the mathematics that works for us uses numbers and has the basic operations; addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponents, roots, etc. What I mean by "exclusive" is that atoms, and the matter that is composed of them, does not come into existence spontaneously and stays as it is until something changes it.
The numbers that we use have no real existence until they are manifested in some way. There is no such thing as the number six that we can see but we see it whenever we have six of something. But any number must exist whether it is manifested by anything or not. Consider the number 37,683,992,651,801,384,161,079,177,209,184. Let's refer to this number as "W". It may be that nowhere in the universe is this number manifested anywhere, but it is still just as much a number nonetheless because it could potentially be manifested. Just as a parking space still exists whether or not there is a car in it.
The mathematics that we use, both inner and outer mathematics, works for us because the matter that we deal with is as it is, matter could be said to be "exclusive". This means that more than one set of matter cannot occupy the same space at the same time and matter cannot come into existence out of nothing. But what if matter, or the entire universe, was completely different?
There would still be mathematics that described it although it would be completely different from the mathematics that we are using. If matter, or whatever that universe was made of, was non-exclusive then there would be no reason for the addition, subtraction and, so on that we use. If that universe was somehow immeasurable or unquantifiable mathematics might express the effect that it has on the living beings rather than what it is actually made of.
Mathematics is inevitably related to scarcity, of not having everything that we need or want and of having to labor to get what we don't have or build what doesn't yet exist or get to somewhere other than where we are. Have you ever noticed that there is no mention of mathematics in Heaven? In Heaven we will have everything we want so why would we have any need to calculate?
The universe of atoms, electric charges and, electromagnetic radiation that we have is just one of an infinite number of possibilities that the universe could have been. It is like rolling dice. The numbers that came up are our universe. The numbers that didn't come up are all of the universes that never physically existed, but yet these numbers still exist.
But the mathematics, completely different from our own, that would have described them must nonetheless still exist. Just as we saw with the number "W" above, a number still exists whether it is manifested or not and the mathematics, which we cannot begin to imagine, of every different universe that never actually existed must also still exist.
This is what I refer to as "Far Outer Mathematics". It is the mathematics of would-have-been universes and physical realms that do not even use the same basic operations as the mathematics that we use. What we could call "Near Outer Mathematics" is, as explained above, mathematics that would use the same basic operations but is beyond our reach because we could not completely understand something whose complexity is greater than our own.
Thursday, July 13, 2023
St. Petersburg And The Romanovs
The Romanov Dynasty is still alive, although it may not be certain who the Tsar of Russia would be if they were still in power. Let's have a look back at the Romanovs and their magnificent capital city of St. Petersburg.
Although the Communists, who replaced the Romanovs in 1917, moved the capital back to Moscow and renamed St. Petersburg as Leningrad today the name of the city has been restored to St. Petersburg, Vladimir Putin is from St. Petersburg, and the Romanov flag has replaced the Communist flag.
The city of St. Petersburg was founded, in the early 18th Century, by the Russian tsar known as Peter the Great. He was the grandson of the first ruler of the Romanov Dynasty, and this is where the Romanov leadership was based for over 200 years. The city was especially built, by forced labor, to be the westward-facing capital of the country, with a seaport and naval base, and the capital was moved there from Moscow.
By the way, the city of St. Petersburg in Florida was named after this city. When on the trip to western Europe, known as the "Great Embassy", Peter the Great became friends with William Penn, the founder of Pennsylvania. The name of Pennsylvania means "Penn's Woods". Maybe there should be a city in Pennsylvania named for St. Petersburg.
During the First World War the name of the city was changed to Petrograd, which sounds more Russian. After the Romanov Dynasty ended, and the Bolsheviks came to power, the name was changed to Leningrad in honor of Lenin. After the end of Communist leadership, the name was changed back to St. Petersburg.
An incredible volume of world history is packed into this city, considering that it was founded barely three hundred years ago.
This is the Peter and Paul Fortress, which is an original part of the city, located on an island in the river. The church with the very tall steeple is the Peter and Paul Cathedral, which is within the fortress. It is where most of the Romanov rulers are buried.
There are multiple scenes following. To see the scenes, after the first one, you must first click the up arrow, ^, before you can move onto the next scene by clicking the right or forward arrow, >. After clicking the up arrow you can then hide the previews of successive scenes, if you wish.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9506425,30.3173665,3a,75y,209.68h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-sjdLyXppAzA%2FV0smK827UwI%2FAAAAAAAABYI%2FUc-KDxOXxSoWcuP5YkNgon3a_n_7CBOmgCJkC!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh6.googleusercontent.com%2F-sjdLyXppAzA%2FV0smK827UwI%2FAAAAAAAABYI%2FUc-KDxOXxSoWcuP5YkNgon3a_n_7CBOmgCJkC%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi0-ya316.92538-ro-0-fo100%2F!7i9728!8i4864
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9393093,30.3167461,3a,75y,108.08h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-4LwlELB8V_o%2FVv76DpkqufI%2FAAAAAAAANn8%2F4s0QGeZ0VAc3rDnkTu8qqFHlsCkur_XfQCJkC!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2F-4LwlELB8V_o%2FVv76DpkqufI%2FAAAAAAAANn8%2F4s0QGeZ0VAc3rDnkTu8qqFHlsCkur_XfQCJkC%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya223.09868-ro0-fo100%2F!7i8704!8i4352
This is Kazan Cathedral, completed in 1811, with the colonnades in the front, facing the famous street called Nevsky Prospekt. There is also a Kazan Cathedral in Moscow, in Red Square.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9342662,30.3244542,3a,75y,279.77h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sNqdNZ729XdLFAFSDva7Zfw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DNqdNZ729XdLFAFSDva7Zfw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D288.96783%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
The most visible landmark in St. Petersburg is St. Isaac's Cathedral. This is a massive structure that resembles other great Baroque-era cathedrals, such as St. Peter's in the Vatican and St, Paul's in London. The young age of the city is seen in the fact that there are no Gothic cathedrals because it was only founded in the early 18th Century, long after the Gothic era. The Peter and Paul Cathedral, within the fortress of the same name, was the original cathedral of the city. St. Isaac's was built in the mid-19th Century.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.933876,30.3059502,3a,75y,71.24h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-V1jJYg7htlU%2FVDkLy9rcnuI%2FAAAAAAAArws%2FOA6Zp31FOy4HewPLjNprc6D26_Ph8BT4gCLIB!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh6.googleusercontent.com%2F-V1jJYg7htlU%2FVDkLy9rcnuI%2FAAAAAAAArws%2FOA6Zp31FOy4HewPLjNprc6D26_Ph8BT4gCLIB%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya57.868935-ro-0-fo100%2F!7i10240!8i5120
This is an Eastern Orthodox Cathedral, which closely resembles the iconic St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow, and is definitely not in the Baroque style of St. Isaac's and Kazan Cathedrals. The interior of this cathedral is rich iconography and golden halos typical of Eastern Orthodox churches. What is now the nearby Russian Museum used to be the Mikhailovsky Palace. The statue of the tsar riding a horse, at the adjacent Marble Palace, is Alexander II son and successor, Alexander III.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9401246,30.3287861,3a,75y,254.09h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-hxb3fc_E8n0%2FWI0S0iS0jpI%2FAAAAAAAADGc%2Fysan0isGEpc5ldRL7Ev8fZDImUhI4A5ZACLIB!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh4.googleusercontent.com%2F-hxb3fc_E8n0%2FWI0S0iS0jpI%2FAAAAAAAADGc%2Fysan0isGEpc5ldRL7Ev8fZDImUhI4A5ZACLIB%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya207.35701-ro0-fo100%2F!7i8704!8i4352
There were several assassins, each armed with a bomb. The idea is that, if the first one didn't get the tsar when he passed by, the next one would. It was the second assassin who threw the fatal bomb after the tsar insisted on stopping to see what had happened when the first bomb exploded.
Thirty-three years later a group of Bosnians, looking to assassinate Archduke Franz Ferdinand of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, would use exactly the same technique. This is what began the First World War, as we saw in the posting on the World and Economics blog, "June 28, 1914, Assassination In Sarajevo":
Here are some scenes further down Nevsky Prospekt, which begins at Palace Square and the Admiralty Building, and might be the single most famous street in the world.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9315591,30.3572698,3a,75y,359.67h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sLnACM8U9Cnt4rwgD4qag7Q!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DLnACM8U9Cnt4rwgD4qag7Q%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D359.83426%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
This is around a complex known as the Smolny Convent. The river through the city is the Neva River.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9489299,30.3942011,3a,75y,77.7h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-99ayBvJWArI%2FV8Y1_xyRCFI%2FAAAAAAAAOqI%2FLKCIpljC8vQRAzI4WcvRYNM2hhx2IP3jgCLIB!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2F-99ayBvJWArI%2FV8Y1_xyRCFI%2FAAAAAAAAOqI%2FLKCIpljC8vQRAzI4WcvRYNM2hhx2IP3jgCLIB%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi3.4415038-ya66.561714-ro8.1394615-fo100%2F!7i7776!8i3888
This is Trinity Cathedral, and the surrounding area. One is never far from a river or channel in St. Petersburg.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9159037,30.305624,3a,75y,41.83h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1srI-9hRvr4AraOysH3fvBcA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DrI-9hRvr4AraOysH3fvBcA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D24.16306%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
Here is the Narva Triumphal Gate, built to celebrate the victory over the forces of Napoleon. It very much resembles Napoleon's own victory arch in Paris, the Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel.
This is Napoleon's Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, in Paris. Note the Chariot of Peace on the top.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_de_Triomphe_du_Carrousel#/media/File:Paris_-_Jardin_des_Tuileries_-_Arc_de_Triomphe_du_Carrousel_-_PA00085992_-_003.jpg
Here is the spectacular Naval Cathedral, located on Kronstadt Island just west of the city. If the interior of the cathedral looks somewhat familiar, it is because it is yet another great building that was modeled on the Hagia Sophia, which we saw in the posting on this blog, "The House Of Holy Wisdom, Where The Modern World Began". The cathedral was built in the early 20th Century, to replace an older church.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9916321,29.7779676,3a,75y,70.22h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-Zk8-QC3_rpI%2FV6Y87602XAI%2FAAAAAAAAAgc%2Fa_tm2rvjab8fYsedHeibAQx1nvScJ2ZBwCLIB!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh6.googleusercontent.com%2F-Zk8-QC3_rpI%2FV6Y87602XAI%2FAAAAAAAAAgc%2Fa_tm2rvjab8fYsedHeibAQx1nvScJ2ZBwCLIB%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya143.28185-ro-0-fo100%2F!7i8704!8i4352
There are several Romanov-era palaces to the south and west of St. Petersburg. This is the Gatchina Palace.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.5635741,30.1076581,3a,75y,113.25h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sGaet4ZHw_SUoWyVAeml_xQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DGaet4ZHw_SUoWyVAeml_xQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D130.29858%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
This is the Palace, built by Peter the Great and known as the Peterhof, that is reminiscent of Versailles.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.8839581,29.9085106,3a,75y,103.57h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s1RGm3PwtRdhiDv7mZHZMMQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D1RGm3PwtRdhiDv7mZHZMMQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D115.682396%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
Here is the Catherine Palace, a summer residence of the Romanov tsars, to the south of St. Petersburg. It was began by Catherine I, the widow of Peter The Great who ruled after his death. It was also important to another Catherine, the later Catherine II who ruled during the heyday of the Romanov Dynasty, and is known as Catherine the Great.
She had been a German princess who was chosen as a bride for Peter III, a grandson of Peter the Great and Catherine I, and who did as much as anyone since Peter the Great to make Russia a great power. It was during her reign that the so-called Russian Enlightenment was going on, and Russia had settlements on the west coast of North America and in Hawaii.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Ross%2C_California#/media/File:FortRoss-chapel-reconstructed.jpg
Catherine was an avid art and antiquities collector, who began the vast museum complex known as the Hermitage which now includes the Winter Palace. The Winter Palace is on the right of the following photo.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitage_Museum#/media/File:HermitageAcrossNeva-2.jpg
This is the Catherine Palace.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.7157612,30.3963243,3a,75y,262.78h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sK5Vi7qHHJ2hmutRf9OGGlg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DK5Vi7qHHJ2hmutRf9OGGlg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D255.89497%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
Adjacent to the Catherine Palace is the smaller Alexander Palace. This was built by Catherine the Great for her grandson, who would rule as Alexander I and be credited with the victory over Napoleon. This was where the last of the tsars, Nicholas II, was born, his favorite residence during his rule, being considered as more secure than the Winter Palace in the center of St. Petersburg, and where he and his family would initially be held after his forced abdication in 1917.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Palace#/media/File:Alexander_palace.JPG
Ironically, the Romanov family would eventually be executed in the distant city of Yekaterinburg (or Ekaterinburg), the name of which means "The City of Catherine".
Catherine the Great would be succeeded by her son, Paul I. He was supposedly fascinated with knights and castles. So he built his own castle, St. Michael's Castle, where he felt safer than in any of the palaces, although he would be murdered in his castle soon after it was constructed in 1800.
Paul I was succeeded by his son, Alexander I. From that point on, all tsars would be named either Alexander or Nicholas. There would be three named Alexander, and two named Nicholas, before the end of the dynasty in 1917. Alexander II was supposedly the last tsar to actually live in the Winter Palace.
This is St. Michael's Castle, back in the center of St. Petersburg near the Winter Palace.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Michael%27s_Castle#/media/File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-St_Michael%27s_Castle_02.jpg
A cannon on the warship Aurora fired a blank shot to announce the storming of the Winter Palace. The crew of the ship had joined the Bolsheviks, even though on the naval base on Kronstadt there would be a rebellion against them. This is the Aurora, now preserved as a museum, and the area around it. The Aurora is symbolic not of the Romanov Dynasty, but of it's overthrow in 1917.
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.9553884,30.3375124,3a,75y,69.12h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-oGH78BrRiOU%2FWEMXhocOeBI%2FAAAAAAAAHCY%2F96oaMaG22ewZdwZDD1D6uTQvcYNQOOV9ACLIB!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2F-oGH78BrRiOU%2FWEMXhocOeBI%2FAAAAAAAAHCY%2F96oaMaG22ewZdwZDD1D6uTQvcYNQOOV9ACLIB%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya22.699348-ro-0-fo100%2F!7i8192!8i4096
But now, with the war making conditions worse, Nicholas was perceived, whether correctly or not, as utterly indifferent to the situation of the vast majority of the population. This indifference was perceived by Nicholas' enemies as going back to when nearly 1,400 people were crushed to death by the crowds at his coronation. Tsarina Alexandra had, by this time, been left effectively in charge of the country as Nicholas left to visit the battlefront. It was hoped that the abdication of Nicholas II would bring calm.
Kerensky and Lenin had been from the same hometown, and his father had once been Lenin's teacher.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipatiev_House#/media/File:Ipatjew-Haus2.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family#/media/File:Russian_Imperial_Family_1913.jpg
By this time civil war was raging between the Reds, which were the Bolsheviks, and everyone from the left and right who opposed them, and were collectively known as the Whites. The Reds would ultimately triumph, but the White forces were advancing closer to where the Romanov family was being housed in Yekaterinburg.
The Bolsheviks were concerned that the Whites would free the Romanov family, and then seek to use them to gain support from their remaining supporters, whether in Russia or abroad. The decision was made that the wisest course of action would be to just kill them. There are so many conflicting reports about what follows next that it is impossible to state with certainty whether or not it was Lenin who gave the order. Lenin's older brother had been executed for a plot to assassinate Alexander III, the son of Alexander II who was assassinated as described earlier.
The family was awakened at about 2 AM on July 17, 1917, and told that they were being moved again for their own safety. They were led into a semi-basement room in the house, and told to wait. Two chairs were brought in, at Tsarina Alexandra's request, and there was a single light bulb in the room. After a few minutes, a group of men with guns came into the room. A statement was read to Nicholas, informing him that they were being executed. The executioners opened fire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family#/media/File:Ipatyev_house_basement.jpg
Nicholas and Alexandra are reported to have died quickly. But the room was dark and dusty, and it was in the days before smokeless gunpowder, and many of the shots bounced off the walls and wounded some of the executioners. It turns out that the princesses had diamonds, and other jewels, secretly sewn into their clothing, and the bullets kept bouncing off these diamonds. Finally, the entire family was dead and their bodies were to be secretly disposed of, to prevent any supporters from making a shrine out of their graves or remains.
My understanding of the burials that have intrigued and mystified the world for a hundred years is that the bodies were disposed of in a mine shaft outside the city. The executioners then realized that the burial site was known and returned to dig up the bodies, and rebury them at a site several miles away. But the truck got stuck in mud, and they decided to lighten the load by burying two of the bodies by the side of the road there. The truck also seems to have carried railroad ties to cover the graves. After that burial, they then decided to just bury the rest there also, which were then buried in a mass grave that was separate from the first two.
Another story is that the bodies were buried in two separate graves so that, if either grave was ever found, it would not be thought that this was the Romanov family, because there were not enough bodies.
The White forces gained control of the area a short time later, and concluded that the bodies were cremated at the mine shaft, and that there was no reburial. Most people now see this as incorrect.
The skulls of most of the family had been smashed, to make identification still more difficult if ever found. I read one story that the princesses had earlier had measles, and a photo was taken of them with their heads shaved. That photo proved invaluable in reconstructing the skulls of each victim from the bone fragments.
The final graves might have remained secret forever, except that one of the executioners lived nearby and liked to talk about the episode to anyone who would listen. An amateur investigator managed to glean enough information to find the mass grave, but not the first two, in 1979. During the Gorbachev era, when society became more open, the find was revealed. The other grave, with the first two bodies, was also later found.
This is the complex of shrines for the Romanov family, outside Yekaterinburg. This is the site where the bodies were originally placed, not the final burial.
https://www.google.com/maps/@56.9422098,60.473259,3a,75y,77.87h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s-OVk1Del1w3Y%2FV71N6nA5dfI%2FAAAAAAABMJ8%2FNWuZ5wIjJCMJMe9b7ofeLSgmRdQ-okRXgCLIB!2e4!3e11!6s%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2F-OVk1Del1w3Y%2FV71N6nA5dfI%2FAAAAAAABMJ8%2FNWuZ5wIjJCMJMe9b7ofeLSgmRdQ-okRXgCLIB%2Fw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya69.49863-ro-0-fo100%2F!7i8704!8i4352
The Ipatiev House, where they were held in their final days, was demolished in 1977. But a church has been built on the site.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipatiev_House#/media/File:Yekaterinburg_cathedral_on_the_blood_2007.jpg
The Romanov Dynasty has been gone for a hundred years. There are a number of claims as to who would be the rightful tsar if it was restored today. But the Communist flag is also gone, and it is the Romanov flag that again flies over Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Russia#/media/File:Flag_of_Russia.svg
Insights Into News
THE RELEASE OF LESLIE VAN HOUTEN
Former member of the "Manson Family", Leslie Van Houten, has been released from prison on parole. The Manson Family, led by Charles Manson, committed two horrific sets of murders in August 1969 in Los Angeles. Leslie Van Houten was involved in the second one.
With all the volumes that have been written about these killings there is something that I haven't seen. It is known that the murders of wealthy and famous white people were committed to make it appear that black militants had done it. This was a time of high racial tension. Manson's idea was that this would set off a great race war which would be the Armageddon foretold in the Bible. The result would be Manson ruling over the world as Christ.
The Second World War, still fresh in memory at the time, had been concluded with two successive atomic bombings, and Armageddon was naturally expected to revolve around such weapons.
What I have never seen pointed out about the Manson murders is that there had been two sets of murders in quick succession, the actress Sharon Tate was murdered in the first one and a grocery store owner and his wife in the second, just as there had been two atomic bombs dropped in quick succession. The first set of murders took place on August 9, which was the anniversary of the Nagasaki bombing.
Is this a coincidence or was it planned this way?
Thursday, July 6, 2023
Coup Attempt In Russia
The alarm clock is sounding. The tea or coffee is ready. We can wake up now.
The recent coup attempt in Russia, that began on June 24 and so alarmed the world, was one hundred percent theatrics.
The coup attempt was very reminiscent of the 1991 August Coup against Mikhail Gorbachev. Boris Yeltsin gained so much from the bizarre coup attempt, the leaders unexpectedly gave up after three days, that he became the next leader of the country. We saw in the compound posting "Investigations", December 2018, section 53) DID BORIS YELTSIN STAGE THE 1991 COUP?, my certainty that Yeltsin staged that coup.
This equally bizarre coup attempt shook the world just as the one in 1991 did. The reason that what goes on in Russia can alarm the world is simply that Russia has thousands of nuclear missiles and whoever might gain control of Russia would also gain control of those missiles.
But why would a coup attempt, by a mercenary organization that was used by the Russian Government, start in distant Rostov and make it's way by convoy toward Moscow, with the global news media continuously reporting on it's progress? If Donald Trump supporters wanted to overthrown the government in Washington they probably wouldn't start with a convoy making it's way to Washington from Denver.
The expressed aim of the coup was not to overthrow Vladimir Putin, or the entire Russian Government, but only the Defense Ministry. This is really a new one. I have been following world news since childhood and I have never heard of a coup that only aimed to overthrow one particular ministry, and not the leader of the country.
Vladimir Putin made an alarmed speech that the existence of Russia itself was threatened by the coup. Dmitry Medvedev was even more alarming, if the rebels should get hold of Russia's nuclear weapons "The world would be on the brink of destruction".
As the convoy passed the city of Voronezh there was a massive blast. A fuel depot had exploded. But there had been no combat. The Russian forces themselves had bombed the fuel depot, supposedly to keep the fuel out of the hands of the rebels. The explosion gave the world's news cameras something to focus on. The explosion looked like a miniature nuclear explosion, as if to remind everyone that a lot of nuclear weapons were at stake here.
The military vehicles patrolling around Moscow, and the tearing up of roads supposedly to hinder the rebel convoy when it was still very far away, looked very much like it was being done for the cameras. Remember that there were only a few thousand rebels in the convoy and I cannot see that they had heavy weapons with them, other than tanks being transported by truck.
Remembering that all I know about this is what was in the news. There were reports that Vladimir Putin left for St. Petersburg by plane while this was going on. But then in St. Petersburg he watched a festival from a yacht. This makes it appear that he wanted to make it look as if he was evacuating Moscow but knew that the coup attempt wasn't for real.
Some Russians cheering the mercenaries on and a few people being killed, or at least reported as killed, was a necessary part of the theatrics.
Then suddenly it was over, just like in 1991. Vladimir Putin at first pronounced dire consequences for the coup plotters but then decided to pardon them, again just like in 1991.
I am certain that the reason for this coup attempt show was to alarm the world, which it definitely succeeded in doing, in order to induce the emergence of the Antichrist, who will seem to have all the answers to everything.
The leader of a band of near-lawless mercenaries apparently almost succeeded at getting control of Russia's thousands of nuclear missiles. Putin appears as weakened after this and who knows when someone else might try to overthrow him, and get hold of all those missiles. This should give the world abundant reason to worry. At least with Putin the world knows what it is dealing with and that he is unlikely to impulsively use nuclear weapons.
The Russian Government knows, as well as the west does, about the End Times, as we saw in the posting "The End Of The World As We Know It". But the "godless Communism" of the Cold War is long gone. Putin and his government now see it as "Holy Russia" against the west that has fallen into decadence and apostasy. The Apocalypse has to happen but Russia will come out of it much better than the decadent west.
Whatever Putin's goals are in Ukraine those goals are secondary to this objective. I don't think he wants to win quickly. The objective is a drawn-out conflict that will alarm and disrupt the world enough to bring about the emergence of the Antichrist, who will seem to have all the answers. Putin is looking at his potential place in eternal history for being the one who got End Times events underway, and this staged theatrical coup attempt was part of that strategy.
Also related to this is last week's postings "Inducing The Apocalypse" and "Prophecy And War In Ukraine".
Vladimir Putin knows exactly what he is doing. There is a saying that "You can fool all of the people some of the time, and you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time". That saying was from before Vladimir Putin came along, although it is Dmitry Medvedev that makes the most apocalyptic statements. Only a few people in the Kremlin are in on what Putin is doing.
A Journey Across Siberia
Russia is by far the largest country in the world, in terms of geographical land area. The country spans two continents. The western part of Russia is in Europe and the eastern part in Asia. The dividing line between the two continents is the Ural Mountains. Siberia is usually defined as the part of Russia that is in Asia.
Did you know that when you look at a full moon you are looking at an area that is just about exactly the size of Russia?
As far as physical geography goes, Europe and Asia are not really separate continents. It is more like Eurasia is one land mass. But there is a definite division between the two with regard to history and culture and, for this reason, we usually consider Europe and Asia as separate continents.Siberia is a vast land area, comprising maybe 1 / 7 of the earth's total land area. But it is, on the average, sparsely populated. The European part of Russia is only about 1 / 4 of Russia's total land area, but has about 3 / 4 of the country's population.
While the average population density of Siberia is low it's population is concentrated in cities with the southern, and warmer, part of the region holding most of the population. Russia's two most populous cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg, are both in European Russia, but the next two cities by population are in Siberia.
Siberia is known today for being very rich in resources. Much of the region is seafloor that was forced upward by tectonic movement, which made room for oil and natural gas to collect underground. Aside from energy, there are also vast mineral resources.
It was in the Sixteenth Century that the Rurik Dynasty of Russia began to explore and build outposts in lands far to the east of Moscow. This policy was continued by the following Romanov Dynasty.
One thing that we can see just by looking around Siberia is that it seems to be more conservative in outlook than European Russia. For one thing, there are still statues of Lenin in city squares that are usually no longer seen in European Russia.
The city of Ufa is actually on the European side of the Ural Mountains but it was one of the eastern outposts and settlements established during the time of Ivan the Terrible, who first proclaimed the Tsardom of Russia from territories that had been consolidated by the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The following scenes are in the central area of Ufa.
There are multiple scenes following. To see the scenes, after the first one, you must first click the up arrow, ^, before you can move on to the next scene by clicking the right or forward arrow, >, After clicking the up arrow, you can then hide the previews of successive scenes, if you wish.
https://www.google.com/maps/@54.7351488,55.9587644,3a,75y,283.82h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipMwQ4B2461mhnDPz6MOrpJGFOpTMhqYph9tQbRn!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipMwQ4B2461mhnDPz6MOrpJGFOpTMhqYph9tQbRn%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya3.073558-ro-0-fo100!7i10000!8i5000
The name of Yekaterinburg, sometimes spelled as Ekaterinburg, means "The City of Catherine". This city is just on the Asian side of a gap in the Ural Mountains and so is sometimes considered as the "gateway to Siberia". The Catherine that the city is named for is Catherine I. She was the wife of Peter the Great, who founded St. Petersburg. Catherine I is not the same as the later Catherine the Great.
Had anyone thought about the irony that the city named for Catherine I is primarily known today as the place where the last Romanov emperor and his family were executed in 1917. But then Boris Yeltsin, who ended the Communism in Russia that had begun with the Bolsheviks who had executed the Romanovs and restored the Romanov flag as Russia's national flag, was from the Yekaterinburg area.
On maps and atlases from before the 1990s this city is named Sverdlovsk, which is what the Communists called it. During the following presidency of Boris Yeltsin, the name of Yekaterinburg was restored. The house where the Romanovs had been staying and were executed, the Ipatiev House, has since been demolished but the site is marked with the Cathedral on the Blood.
But this city is far more than just the place where the Romanovs were executed. Today it is the fourth-largest city in the country by population, and is known for it's prosperity and for being a good place to live. This is central Yekaterinburg.
https://www.google.com/maps/@56.8372815,60.5950196,3a,75y,129.48h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sm9y-O8Yn4e_lomJVP84S-w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dm9y-O8Yn4e_lomJVP84S-w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D146.41267%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
The city of Chelyabinsk was in the news in 2013 when a meteor entered the atmosphere and exploded above the city, doing quite a bit of damage. Siberia as a whole is known for the Tunguska Event, although this was not near Chelyabinsk. A large meteor or, as I believe, a small comet exploded in the atmosphere. The shock waves were felt across the world and the force of the explosion knocked over millions of trees over thousands of square kilometers in Siberia.
Theories are still being put forth today about this great explosion of 1908 in the sky above a remote part of Siberia. The lack of an impact crater seems to indicate that it was a comet, made primarily of ice that turned to water, rater than a meteor made of rock or metal. But some claim that there is a small lake that was not there before and that this is the impact crater.
At any rate, here is the city of Chelyabinsk.
https://www.google.com/maps/@55.1602905,61.4026636,3a,75y,246.86h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sPuAEU2MNiA_BlvvNkyQ_ig!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DPuAEU2MNiA_BlvvNkyQ_ig%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D233.20198%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
Tyumen is one of the cities that grew from outposts established in Siberia in the late Sixteenth Century.
https://www.google.com/maps/@57.1565084,65.5337392,3a,75y,184.26h,90t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1sNdIRgr3EksSNLVBQ3UII9A!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DNdIRgr3EksSNLVBQ3UII9A%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D182.31348%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
Tobolsk, another Siberian city originating in the Sixteenth Century, is where the Romanov family was originally sent, for their own safety during the Russian Civil War, before being moved back westward to Yekaterinburg. The following scenes begin in the Tobolsk Kremlin. Remember that the best-known Russian kremlin is the one in Moscow, but a kremlin actually means a fortified citadel that is found in some other Russian cities as well.
https://www.google.com/maps/@58.1999795,68.2510578,3a,75y,86.83h,90t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipPSVC8jcHUXFLplGeaOi225U7PuVoEKFukEeqA-!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipPSVC8jcHUXFLplGeaOi225U7PuVoEKFukEeqA-%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi23.887123-ya76.45351-ro24.537546-fo100!7i7200!8i3600
Omsk is not as old as some of the other Siberian cities, having been founded in the Eighteenth Century.
https://www.google.com/maps/@54.9840209,73.388351,3a,75y,140h,110t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1sobxebt8_xPttqaqN3zSTvQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3Dobxebt8_xPttqaqN3zSTvQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D140%26pitch%3D-20%26thumbfov%3D100
Novosibirsk is a newer city, from the late Nineteenth Century, but is today the largest city in Siberia and the third largest city in Russia, after Moscow and St. Petersburg.
https://www.google.com/maps/@55.030126,82.920433,3a,75y,40h,100t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipPYnbR56MBCO0sFcJh_s_oZX9KiU_SKMmEjZRmm!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipPYnbR56MBCO0sFcJh_s_oZX9KiU_SKMmEjZRmm%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-10-ya132.00002-ro-0-fo100!7i8704!8i4352
The cities in Siberia that are further to the west, closer to European Russia, grew from outposts that were founded in the Sixteenth Century. As exploration of Siberia proceeded further eastward, other cities were founded in the following century. This is the city of Tomsk.
https://www.google.com/maps/@56.4867216,84.9506999,3a,75y,126.28h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sFVCJjXX30b13oHKPK2g1mQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DFVCJjXX30b13oHKPK2g1mQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D143.04652%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
Krasnoyarsk is another city that first began in the Seventeenth Century. Here are some modern residential buildings
https://www.google.com/maps/@56.0404483,92.902209,3a,75y,152.67h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1ssUu5LSUiqYwHkgaewfz-eg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DsUu5LSUiqYwHkgaewfz-eg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D163.8971%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656
Irkutsk originated in the mid-Seventeenth Century.
https://www.google.com/maps/@52.2865103,104.2815225,3a,75y,290.43h,90t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1s56n_PAdYqg_4hv1DyrtY9w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D56n_PAdYqg_4hv1DyrtY9w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D301.33633%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100
Finally, we arrive on Russia's Pacific coast. This is the city of Vladivostok. It is not a very old city, only from the Nineteenth Century. But it is Russia's window on the Pacific Ocean and the Far East, and is possibly the most strategically-located city in the world. St. Petersburg, at the opposite end of Russia, is over 6500 km, or 4,000 miles, away.
https://www.google.com/maps/@43.1234979,131.8779782,3a,75y,160h,100t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipO-U5L8LeOrmfeje2i2ZPtV5baVrNKxR2qWucxU!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipO-U5L8LeOrmfeje2i2ZPtV5baVrNKxR2qWucxU%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-10-ya230-ro0-fo100!7i7076!8i3538